Inclusion of these issues in trade pacts could have negative impacts, they said, adding that the recent US presidential memorandum of Joe Biden on worker rights indicates a deepening focus on labour standards in trade deals.
Negotiations are on fast track with a comprehensive trade agreement with the UK, which seeks to promote trade in goods, services and two-way investments.
Think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) Ajay Srivastava said that such provisions could erode the competitive advantage of developing countries by inflating manufacturing costs.
Citing an example, he said that the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement, which mandates a minimum wage in Mexico’s auto sector, potentially diminishes its competitiveness.
Sharing similar views, trade expert and former government official Sangeeta Godbole also expressed reservations about labour clauses in trade deals. She was involved in the negotiations of the India-EU trade agreement. “Even non-binding labour provisions in the EU-South Korea FTA led to a dispute adversely impacting South Korea’s auto industry, cautioning against complacency in negotiations,” Godbole said.
International trade expert Abhijit Das said that labour provisions in trade agreements often seek enforcement of domestic laws and can lead to punitive actions for non-compliance.
He noted that the labour clauses in the recent supply chain resilience agreement under IPEF as a potential gateway for increased scrutiny and a pressure point for the imposition of import restrictions in future based on alleged labour law violations.
“India must tread carefully in negotiating labour provisions in trade agreements, mindful of the potential repercussions on its manufacturing sector and overall trade competitiveness,” the experts said.
